Posted by: Salil V Gangal on April 20, 19103 at 20:05:09
In Reply to: Re: Where the WMD went posted by gs on April 20, 19103 at 18:54:04 |
>>My main point was just to point out that the definition of what is or is not a WMD is really a fuzzy line.
<<
Hmmm ... So even with this line being fuzzy the Occupying Forces have not been able to find any so far ! (Gosh ... don't tell me that perhaps the Occupying Forces will round up a bunch of buchers who possess long choppers and accuse them of being terrorists with WMDs !)
>>I am not opposed to all military training costs, just terrorist training camps aimed at the US and our Allies.<<
Err ... but for that first you have to make an accurate (shall I say un-fuzzy ? *smile*) determination about whether the military training camp anywhere is aimed against the US or not. Just how do you plan to make this difficult determination when you don't even have a clear (or un-fuzzy *smile*) idea of what qualifies as a WMD and what does not ?
>>Let's use some common sense here, and not get hung up on nitpicking.<<
A clear definition of what WMD is and what isn't, is not nitpicking. It forms the necessary common basis of any discussion about WMDs.
Regards,
Salil V Gangal
Read the Follow Ups: |
FVDB Counter: 4480264 (since 09/16/98) | Friday - 11/15/24 - 03:45:10 |